January 3, 2013
Kyle Fee and Nelson Oliver
As of September 2012, the unemployment rate for the Fourth District stood at 7.1 percent, having declined gradually throughout the year. Since this time last year, the rate has fallen 1.4 percent, and since the end of the recession in June of 2009, it has fallen 2.7 percent. Compared to the national unemployment rate, the District’s has tended to be slightly higher, but it now rests below the national rate of 7.8 percent.

County-level unemployment rates across the Fourth District ranged from a low of 4.2 percent in Mercer County, Ohio, to a high of 16.2 percent in Magoffin County, Kentucky. Since the end of the second quarter, the median unemployment rate has fallen 0.2 percent (from 7.3 percent to 7.1 percent). Despite a notable decline in the Fourth District’s overall unemployment rate, 30.7 percent of the counties in the District (52 of 169) have seen their unemployment rates increase over the past three months.

County-level patterns often reflect statewide unemployment rates. For example, as of September 2012, the unemployment rate for Ohio was 7.1 percent, for Pennsylvania 8.2 percent, Kentucky 8.4 percent, and West Virginia 7.6 percent. Annual changes in the states’ unemployment rates ranged from a 0.2 percent increase in Pennsylvania to a 1.5 percent decline in Ohio. Of the 169 counties that make up the District, 86 (50.8 percent) have an unemployment rate at or below the national level. Conversely, 19.5 percent of the District’s counties have a double-digit unemployment rate. This percentage is a strong improvement from the 41.4 percent recorded this time last year and an even more dramatic improvement from the peak of over 77 percent in October 2009. Geographically, unemployment remains the highest in remote areas of Ohio and Kentucky, while rural Pennsylvania has maintained a stronger labor market.

By many measures employment growth has been much slower than anticipated. On the national level, the size of the civilian labor force—those employed or looking for work—has exceeded pre-recession levels, but the Fourth District still struggles to make significant gains to its labor force. The total number of individuals actually employed has yet to reach pre-recession levels, though employment growth for the District and the nation has been nearly identical.


About the Author
Kyle Fee
| Senior Research Analyst
Kyle Fee is a senior research analyst in the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. His research interests include economic development, regional economics and economic geography...Read full bio
About the Author
Nelson Oliver
| Research Analyst
Nelson Oliver is a research analyst in the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. His primary interests include urban revitalization, housing policy, and applied microeconomics...Read full bio